Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42359002›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2026

Challenges in predicting chromatin accessibility differences between species.

Amy Z M Stephen, Arian Raje, Heather H Sestili, Morgan E Wirthlin, Alyssa J Lawler, Ashley R Brown, Junjie Ma, William R Stauffer, Andreas R Pfenning, Irene M Kaplow

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amy Z M StephenMathematical Sciences Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8872-8972
Arian RajeRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Heather H SestiliRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Morgan E WirthlinRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Alyssa J LawlerRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Ashley R BrownRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3091-3930
Junjie MaBiological Sciences Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
William R StaufferDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213,United States.
Andreas R PfenningRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Irene M KaplowRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8924-8269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in enhancer activity between species can help drive phenotypic diversity, yet enhancers often have conserved functions despite rapid sequence evolution, posing a challenge for quantifying their functional differences between species. Previous machine learning models have focused on the binary task of predicting differences in the presence of enhancers between species but have yet to demonstrate an ability to predict continuous differences in enhancer activity. Here, we trained convolutional neural networks on a regression task to predict chromatin accessibility-a proxy for enhancer activity-in the liver across five mammals, and we developed a novel framework to evaluate cross-species performance. We demonstrated that training on multiple species improves model generalization to both species used in training and held-out species. However, the models consistently achieved poor performance in predicting quantitative differences in accessibility between species at orthologous regions. Our study highlights the challenges in using regression models to predict chromatin accessibility changes between species. All data and code are available at http://daphne.compbio.cs.cmu.edu/files/azstephe/liver_regression_resource/ and https://figshare.com/projects/liverRegression/274293.

Indexed as

ChromatinEnhancer Elements, GeneticAnimalsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansLiverMachine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsSpecies SpecificityChromatin

Identifiers

PMID42359002
PMCPMC13291610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.