ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2026
Challenges in predicting chromatin accessibility differences between species.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differences in enhancer activity between species can help drive phenotypic diversity, yet enhancers often have conserved functions despite rapid sequence evolution, posing a challenge for quantifying their functional differences between species. Previous machine learning models have focused on the binary task of predicting differences in the presence of enhancers between species but have yet to demonstrate an ability to predict continuous differences in enhancer activity. Here, we trained convolutional neural networks on a regression task to predict chromatin accessibility-a proxy for enhancer activity-in the liver across five mammals, and we developed a novel framework to evaluate cross-species performance. We demonstrated that training on multiple species improves model generalization to both species used in training and held-out species. However, the models consistently achieved poor performance in predicting quantitative differences in accessibility between species at orthologous regions. Our study highlights the challenges in using regression models to predict chromatin accessibility changes between species. All data and code are available at http://daphne.compbio.cs.cmu.edu/files/azstephe/liver_regression_resource/ and https://figshare.com/projects/liverRegression/274293.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.