ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Antineoplastic agent-associated interstitial lung disease in breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers: a pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a potentially fatal adverse effect of anticancer therapy, but comparative ILD reporting associations across antineoplastic agents in sex hormone-sensitive solid tumors (breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers) remain unclear. This study aimed to compare ILD reporting associations among antineoplastic agents used in these malignancies and to provide external clinical context from the published literature. We analyzed FAERS reports of ILD associated with 65 prespecified antineoplastic agents used in patients with sex hormone-sensitive solid tumors. Each drug's ILD reporting association was evaluated using disproportionality analysis (reporting odds ratios), multivariable regression, and time-to-onset analyses. In addition, we conducted a structured PubMed search through March 15, 2026 for eligible human case reports and case series involving these agents. Among 8,146 FAERS ILD reports, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) showed a prominent ILD signal and the highest adjusted reporting association. Some sex hormone-pathway agents, including darolutamide and fulvestrant, also showed elevated ILD reporting associations, and concomitant SHA analyses identified additional signals. Older age and lower body weight were independently associated with ILD reporting. In exploratory complete-case TTO analyses, death-recorded ILD reports showed a shorter median reported TTO than non-death-recorded ILD reports; in FDR-adjusted body-weight-stratified analyses, this pattern was observed in the ≥70 kg subgroup but not in the <70 kg subgroup and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. The literature review identified 85 eligible publications comprising 98 case-level records and provided supportive clinical context for the FAERS findings. Overall, ILD reporting associations vary across antineoplastic agents used for sex hormone-sensitive solid tumors, even within the same class. Notably, underemphasized signals were observed for certain SHAs. These findings support early ILD monitoring and attention to patient factors such as age and body weight, while underscoring the need for cautious interpretation and confirmation in prospective and real-world studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.