ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2026
Protocols and Trends in Maintaining the Stability of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes in Croatia over 10 Years: A Repeated Cross - Sectional Study.
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital Analysis of Occlusal Contacts in Angle Class II and Class III Malocclusion.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim was to analyze current orthodontic retention protocols in Croatia and their trend over a 10-year period. Subjects and Methods: In a repeated cross-sectional survey, questionnaires were distributed to 150 orthodontists in Croatia in 2013 and 185 of them in 2023 (representing 69% and 85% of practicing orthodontists with response rates of 61% and 75%). Results: Significant changes in retainer types across different malocclusions and treatment protocols were observed over a 10-year period. There was an increase in the use of VFR and a decrease in acrylic retention plates in both jaws (p≤0.001). Over the decade, the use of only fixed retention in the mandible declined from 20% to 7% (p=0.007), and the combination of fixed and removable retention in the maxilla dropped from 29% to 17% (p≤0.033). Increased use of removable retainers was noted in cases involving rotations, open bites, and extractions. Conversely, fixed-removable retainers were more frequently used in spacing cases (p≤0.001). There was a trend toward fewer check-ups (p=0.001) and toward increased patient self-monitoring (p=0.021). Personal experience as the primary reason for choosing a retention protocol increased from 39% to 62% (p<0.001). Additionally, the use of written information on retention rose from 39% to 69% (p<0.001). Conclusion: Retention practices in Croatia have evolved over the past decade, characterized by increased use of VFRs, more frequent implementation of dual retention in the mandible, and greater provision of written retention information. Additionally, follow-up protocols have shifted toward fewer scheduled visits, with increased emphasis on patient self-monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.