ArticleMethodsX2026
Migrant patients in intensive care units: nursing role and cultural adaptation of humanization models - A scoping review protocol.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Linguistic barriers in intensive care units (ICUs) are independently associated with increased mortality (OR 1.21), higher readmission rates, and reduced family participation in end-of-life decisions. Despite advances in ICU humanization, no existing model has been developed or validated for migrant or culturally and linguistically diverse populations. This protocol describes a scoping review that will map evidence on experiences of migrant patients and their families in ICUs, analyse existing humanization models and their degree of cultural adaptation, and explore the nursing role and moral distress in this context. The review follows JBI methodology and will be reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Seven bibliographic databases will be searched (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, BVS, CUIDEN). The protocol is prospectively registered in OSF (DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BE4DK).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.