Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42358852›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

DPTG: diffusion policy with tactile feasibility guidance.

Jin Liu, Hongzhan Yu, Can Zhao, Haonan Zhao, Zhemeng Zhang, Daolin Ma, Weiming Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jin LiuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Hongzhan YuXense Robotics, Shanghai, China.
Can ZhaoSchool of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Haonan ZhaoSchool of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhemeng ZhangSchool of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Daolin MaSchool of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Weiming WangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic manipulation in contact-rich environments requires integrating vision and tactile sensing, yet effective fusion of these modalities remains challenging. Existing methods often adopt symmetric feature fusion or joint policy learning, implicitly treating tactile as a continuous motion generator comparable to vision. However, this misaligns with the nature of touch, which primarily provides physical constraints and phase cues rather than action proposals. In this work, we propose DPTG, a framework that reformulates tactile sensing as a physical feasibility constraint rather than a parallel action generator. Actions are sampled from a vision-driven diffusion policy and guided by a tactile feasibility classifier. To extract phase-relevant cues, we derive an adaptive guidance schedule from feasibility scores, selectively activating constraints only when contact is informative. Moreover, the feasibility classifier is trained as a standalone module using interaction signals, enabling classifier reuse across related tasks that share the same action space and tactile setup. Experiments in simulation and the real world demonstrate that DPTG improves success rates while reducing peak forces, leading to safer and more stable contact interactions than baselines.

Indexed as

contact-rich manipulationdiffusion policyfeasibility guidancetactile sensingvision-tactile manipulation

Identifiers

PMID42358852
PMCPMC13290619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.