ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
DPTG: diffusion policy with tactile feasibility guidance.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic manipulation in contact-rich environments requires integrating vision and tactile sensing, yet effective fusion of these modalities remains challenging. Existing methods often adopt symmetric feature fusion or joint policy learning, implicitly treating tactile as a continuous motion generator comparable to vision. However, this misaligns with the nature of touch, which primarily provides physical constraints and phase cues rather than action proposals. In this work, we propose DPTG, a framework that reformulates tactile sensing as a physical feasibility constraint rather than a parallel action generator. Actions are sampled from a vision-driven diffusion policy and guided by a tactile feasibility classifier. To extract phase-relevant cues, we derive an adaptive guidance schedule from feasibility scores, selectively activating constraints only when contact is informative. Moreover, the feasibility classifier is trained as a standalone module using interaction signals, enabling classifier reuse across related tasks that share the same action space and tactile setup. Experiments in simulation and the real world demonstrate that DPTG improves success rates while reducing peak forces, leading to safer and more stable contact interactions than baselines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.