Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42358798›Full record

ArticleInfection prevention in practice2026

Development of infection control and preventive nursing assessment tool for central line-associated bloodstream infection in selected hospitals in China: an exploratory sequential mixed-method study.

Xiuwen Chi, Jianping Yang, Tuyong Liang, Juan Guo, Huishi Huang, Jialing Liang, Lijuan Wu, Zhen Huang, Jordan T Salvador

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiuwen ChiSchool of Nursing, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Jianping YangThe First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Tuyong LiangDongguan Songshan Lake Central Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Juan GuoSchool of Nursing, Heze Medical College, Heze, Shandong, China.
Huishi HuangSchool of Nursing, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Jialing LiangSchool of Nursing, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Lijuan WuSchool of Nursing, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Zhen HuangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine of Pingshan District Maternal & Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jordan T SalvadorDepartment of Nursing Education, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Extended hospital stays, higher hospital costs, and increased mortality are common central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) outcomes. Nurses' roles in preventing CLABSI are vital. Improving patient outcomes requires action to ensure intensive care unit (ICU) nurses' strict adherence with nursing practice guidelines. Aim: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a nursing assessment tool to enhance CLABSI prevention and infection control in Chinese ICUs. Study design: We used an exploratory sequential mixed-method design using a three-stage sequential procedure: phase 1, an exploratory descriptive design involving interviews with 15 nurse experts and analysis using the Colaizzi method; phase 2, tool development and evaluation, including rigorous assessment of internal consistency and reliability using Cronbach's α and split-half test; and phase 3, a descriptive design applying the newly developed tool to 183 registered nurses in China. We evaluated demographic variable effects using one-way analysis of variance and independent samples Results: The six themes of the CLABSI assessment tool covered the entire central venous catheter insertion and maintenance processes. The themes' weighted mean values were 4.57, 4.51, 4.49, 4.38, 4.37, and 3.86 for innovation for maintenance, innovation for replacement of infusion sets, innovation for cannulation procedure, internal environment, recipient, and external environment, respectively. The overall weighted mean of the tool was 4.43. Conclusions: The CLABSI assessment tool was highly accepted by ICU nurses. Most items align with current evidence-based guidelines. Some items reflect interventions proven effective in clinical practice, even exceeding guideline recommendations.

Indexed as

BloodChinaInfectionsIntensive careNurses

Identifiers

PMID42358798
PMCPMC13292669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.