ArticleJournal of aging research2026
The Effect of Age on Post-Stroke Language Outcomes.
Article in Journal of aging research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effect of Age on Post-Stroke Language Outcomes.Journal of aging research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigates how chronological age at stroke onset affects post-stroke language abilities and recovery. Using cross-sectional and retrospective data, we investigated (A) which language tasks are sensitive to age; (B) whether any age-related effects are modified by factors such as lesion size, initial severity and education and (C) whether age influences recovery from aphasia. Methods: Language abilities were assessed in 749 participants using (i) the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) at a single time point and (ii) self-reported measures of speaking, understanding, reading and writing ability both at 1 week and 1 year post-stroke. The outcomes investigated, using multiple linear regression, were (1) CAT language scores and (2) self-reported recovery scores at 1 year post-stroke. Lesion size, initial severity, sex, handedness, pre-stroke education and time post-stroke were controlled. Bayesian statistics assessed the strength of evidence for observed effects. Results: (A) Irrespective of lesion or symptom severity, older age at stroke onset was associated with worse performance across multiple language domains, including overall language ability, nonword and word repetition, semantic and letter fluency, object naming and comprehension of spoken and written words and sentences. Effect sizes were strongest for nonword repetition ( Conclusion: Older age at stroke onset significantly worsened language outcomes, highlighting the sensitivity of aphasia assessments to age-related differences in post-stroke language abilities. This disadvantage was greatest in participants with both large lesions and severe initial symptoms. Considering age when interpreting assessment scores would optimise diagnosis and prognostic accuracy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.