ArticleArchives of physiotherapy
Exploring gender differences in Physiotherapy research in Italy: a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Archives of physiotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gender equity in scientific research, especially in Physiotherapy, reveals significant underrepresentation of women, affecting career advancement, salary, and research recognition. This study aims to examine the characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and productivity of Physiotherapy researchers in Italy, focusing on gender distribution. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on Italian Physiotherapists who either have a PhD or are currently enrolled in PhD programs.We used a survey consisting of 62 items that explored demographic and educational characteristics, research experience, work-life balance, attitude and social norms, and career-related factors. Performance metrics included H-index, number of publications (during PhD and in the whole career), and awards. Results: Of the 167 Physiotherapists surveyed, 102 participated. Female participants reported worse attitudes and social norms perception, and during their PhD, were less satisfied with work conditions compared to males. Females reported a median of 3 publications during their PhD, and males 5. However, after adjusting for age, time invested in research, and whether the interviewee lives with a partner, age remains the only associated factor. There is no evidence of an association between gender and H-index or awards. Conclusion: Gender-based disparities in research attitudes exist in Physiotherapy, particularly during the PhD phase, favoring males. Further research is needed to promote gender equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.