Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42358757›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2026

Trade-offs between proximity and physical contact during group integration in pigs (

Sunil Khatiwada, Victoria E Lee, Simon P Turner, Irene Camerlink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Social behavioural profiles in pigs and the role of sex, dominance and kinship.Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sunil KhatiwadaAnimal Behaviour and Welfare Department, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Postępu 36a Jastrzębiec 05-552, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1807-7375
Victoria E LeeAnimal Behaviour & Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Department, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), West Mains Rd., Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK.
Simon P TurnerAnimal Behaviour & Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Department, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), West Mains Rd., Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK.
Irene CamerlinkAnimal Behaviour and Welfare Department, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Postępu 36a Jastrzębiec 05-552, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During behavioral trade-offs, individuals have to decide whether to express a behavior which may lead to a reward or potential costs when engaging in a risky situation. Social integration forces animals to make such trade-offs. We hypothesized that animals predominantly demonstrate nontactile behavior and hence less tactile behavior in a high-risk context such as during social integration, while using tactile behavior more than nontactile in less risky situations such as under social stability. Pigs (

Indexed as

aggressionbehavioral trade-offsgroup dynamicssocial behaviorsocial nosingSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID42358757
PMCPMC13290397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.