ArticleInternational journal of public health2026
Individual placement and support in Mexico: barriers and facilitators.
Article in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model has proven effective in different high-income countries. However, its implementation in low- and middle-income countries presents a new challenge. This study identified potential barriers and facilitators for IPS implementation in the metropolitan area of Guadalajara, México, to prepare for a clinical trial. Methods: The study explored potential barriers and facilitators to implementing IPS in the metropolitan area of Guadalajara, Mexico, from the perspectives of 61 diverse stakeholders in mental health interest groups: policymakers, administrators, providers, service users, and potential employers. The study used semi-structured, qualitative interviews and structured questionnaires tailored to each participant group and their specific roles. Results: Major themes of barriers were stigma, limitations in treating people with serious mental illness, difficulties related to users and their support networks, and systems barriers. Potential facilitators included the effectiveness of programs and specific activities, institutional collaboration, patient-centered approach, and characteristics of IPS. Conclusion: The study provided critical information on challenges and potential strategies prior to an upcoming trial of IPS supported employment services in a large, middle-income country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.