ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Risk factors, subtype profiles, and outcomes of cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction: a case-control study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac rupture (CR) is a fatal mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with mortality rates exceeding 50%. Early identification of high-risk patients remains clinically important, especially in regions with delayed presentation and limited contemporary data. Methods: This retrospective case-control study included 71 unique patients with CR [free wall rupture (FWR) 39, ventricular septal rupture (VSR) 28, papillary muscle rupture (PMR) 4] and 213 AMI controls without mechanical complications (1:3 ratio, stratified by AMI type) from a tertiary hospital in Wuhan, China (June 2020-December 2025). Factors independently associated with CR were identified using multivariable logistic regression with the events-per-variable principle (≥10). Model discrimination was assessed by the C-statistic and calibration by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Subtype comparisons (FWR vs. VSR), early (≤3 days) vs. late (>3 days) rupture analysis, and in-hospital mortality correlates were also evaluated. Results: Patients with CR were older (69.6 ± 8.5 vs. 59.5 ± 11.7 years, Conclusions: Absence of emergency PCI, Killip class III-IV, female sex, and hypoalbuminemia were independently associated with CR after AMI. FWR and VSR showed different clinical and hemodynamic patterns. Surgical repair was associated with lower in-hospital mortality among selected CR patients, supporting prompt multidisciplinary evaluation while recognizing the likelihood of survivor and indication bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.