ReviewFrontiers in allergy2026
The forgotten billion: bridging the global allergy care chasm through scalable, equity-driven strategies.
Review in Frontiers in allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Allergic diseases affect more than one billion people globally, yet care access is profoundly unequal. The "forgotten billion" refers to underserved populations-especially in LMICs and marginalized groups within high-income countries-who face disproportionate morbidity and preventable deaths due to gaps in diagnosis, essential medicines, immunotherapy and biologics, trained workforce, and policy prioritization. Objective: To synthesize recent (2014-2026) evidence on global burden and inequities in allergic disease care, analyze system-level gaps, review scalable innovations, present diverse case studies, and propose prioritized recommendations, monitoring frameworks, and a research and financing agenda. Methods: We conducted a structured narrative review of peer-reviewed literature and global guidance documents, focusing on burden metrics (prevalence, DALYs, mortality), access indicators, interventions (task-sharing, telemedicine, point-of-care tools, immunotherapy access, digital health, procurement/policy levers), and implementation science frameworks. Sources prioritized include WHO materials and guideline bodies (GINA, ARIA, EAACI), plus global reports and primary studies. Results: Asthma illustrates the equity chasm: in 2019 it caused approximately 21.6 million DALYs and approximately 461,000 deaths globally, with approximately 90% of burden borne in LMICs and most deaths occurring in LMICs. Systematic reviews show essential inhaled asthma medicines-especially inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and ICS-containing combinations-are often unavailable or unaffordable in LMICs. Scalable strategies with documented impact include task-shifted care packages (Malawi), standardized primary care training (South Africa), community health worker home visiting (Boston), and public-sector access programs (Brazil), alongside national allergy strategies (Finland). Conclusions: Closing the allergy care chasm requires shifting from specialist-centric innovation to systems-first equity: universal access to essential medicines and equitable pathways to targeted therapies for severe disease, standardized primary care delivery with task-sharing, market-shaping and pricing policy reform, digitally enabled self-management designed to reduce (not widen) inequities, and integrated environmental action. Implementation must be measured with equity-sensitive frameworks and supported by durable financing aligned with UHC and NCD agendas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.