ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2026
Use of an Extended-Length Tibial Tray in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Rate of Subsidence, Loosening, Heterotopic Bone Formation, and Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implications of Size and Gender for Implant Fit and Coverage in Total Ankle Replacement.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has continued to increase in popularity as a treatment for ankle arthritis. Despite popularity, continual updates to implant designs strive for improved outcomes which has led to different implant design changes including an extended-length tibial tray to offer more distal tibia cortical coverage. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic findings (tibial component subsidence, tibial component loosening, heterotopic ossification [HO]) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between 2 age-, gender-, and body mass index-matched TAA groups. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of TAA patients matched into 2 groups: group 1 patients received the extended tibial tray implant, and group 2 received the standard tibial tray implant. Pre- and postoperative lateral radiographs and PROMs (Veterans-RAND 12 [VR-12] Item Health Survey, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale [AOS], visual analog scale [VAS], and patient satisfaction) were analyzed. Results: Seventy-eight patients were allocated to each group. The mean age was 66.7 years in group 1 and 66.9 years in group 2, with a mean follow-up of 44.6 months and 50.7 months, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups for pre- and postoperative PROMs. Group 1 had higher patient satisfaction with overall care (95.4 vs 89.8, Conclusion: Results appear to indicate that using TAA implants with an extended-length tibial tray is associated with more complete distal tibia cortical coverage, a numerically lower but statistically nonsignificant rate of tibial component subsidence, less heterotopic ossification formation, a trend toward greater postoperative plantarflexion, and higher patient satisfaction with overall care. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.