ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Review 3D-Printed hydrogels for tissue engineering: a review.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Engineering Parameter Window for Filament Formation and Early-Stage Evolution in Embedded Printing of Gelatin/Alginate Hydrogels Within Carbomer Support Baths.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting of hydrogels has emerged as an important strategy in tissue engineering because it enables the fabrication of scaffolds with controllable architectures, tunable properties, and biomimetic microenvironments. This review primarily focuses on recent advances in hydrogel-based 3D bioprinting over the past 2 decades, while also incorporating selected landmark studies to provide historical context for the evolution of the field. Major hydrogel printing techniques, including light-based, extrusion-based, and inkjet-based systems, are discussed and compared in terms of printing resolution, structural fidelity, material compatibility, cytocompatibility, and practical limitations. In addition, the roles of natural and synthetic hydrogels are examined, highlighting their distinct yet complementary advantages in bioactivity, printability, and mechanical performance. Recent progress in tough and composite hydrogels is further reviewed, with emphasis on strategies such as nanocomposite reinforcement, supramolecular interactions, double-network formation, gradient structures, and hydrogel-polymer hybrids for improving the mechanical durability and functional performance of printed constructs. The review also summarizes emerging applications in wound healing, cartilage repair, bone and osteochondral engineering, vascularized tissue fabrication, and other tissue-specific systems, while addressing major translational challenges, including scalability, vascularization, reproducibility, manufacturing standardization, and regulatory considerations. Overall, this review provides an updated and integrated perspective on the design, fabrication, functional optimization, and clinical translation potential of 3D-printed hydrogels for tissue engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.