Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42358438›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Using prescription drug data for timely assessments of state insurance coverage rates: a validation study.

Benjamin N Rome, Adrianna McIntyre, Jinwoo Kim, Jihye Han, Aaron S Kesselheim, Benjamin D Sommers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin N RomeProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5776-3293
Adrianna McIntyreDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5582-9260
Jinwoo KimDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9269-553X
Jihye HanProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6068-0188
Aaron S KesselheimProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8867-2666
Benjamin D SommersDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-6047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Timely assessments of insurance coverage are limited by lags and unpredictable data availability. We assessed the performance of real-time prescription data as a proxy for state-level coverage changes. Methods: We analyzed correlations between quarterly state insurance coverage (Medicaid, private insurance, and uninsured) and counts of filled prescriptions per capita by payer (Medicaid, private insurance, and cash-pay/assistance programs) from 2013 to 2024. Regression models measured how predictive prescription counts were of within-state coverage changes. Results: Medicaid prescriptions per capita were strongly correlated with Medicaid coverage (ρ = 0.62). Cash-pay prescriptions per capita were moderately correlated with uninsured rates (ρ = 0.49). Private coverage correlations were weak. Correlations were stronger for adults (ρ = 0.74 for Medicaid, ρ = 0. 52 for uninsured) than children. Among adults, each 10% within-state increase in Medicaid prescriptions was associated with a 7.5% relative increase (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7%-9.3%) in Medicaid coverage; each 10% increase in cash-pay prescriptions was associated with a 2.5% increase (95% CI, 1.0%-4.1%) in uninsured rates. Conclusions: Real-time prescription drug data are moderately to highly correlated with state-level coverage changes in Medicaid and uninsured rates, particularly for adults. These data may be useful for timely assessments of upcoming policies affecting Medicaid coverage.

Indexed as

insurance coverageMedicaidprescription drugsuninsuredvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID42358438
PMCPMC13293373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.