ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Using prescription drug data for timely assessments of state insurance coverage rates: a validation study.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Timely assessments of insurance coverage are limited by lags and unpredictable data availability. We assessed the performance of real-time prescription data as a proxy for state-level coverage changes. Methods: We analyzed correlations between quarterly state insurance coverage (Medicaid, private insurance, and uninsured) and counts of filled prescriptions per capita by payer (Medicaid, private insurance, and cash-pay/assistance programs) from 2013 to 2024. Regression models measured how predictive prescription counts were of within-state coverage changes. Results: Medicaid prescriptions per capita were strongly correlated with Medicaid coverage (ρ = 0.62). Cash-pay prescriptions per capita were moderately correlated with uninsured rates (ρ = 0.49). Private coverage correlations were weak. Correlations were stronger for adults (ρ = 0.74 for Medicaid, ρ = 0. 52 for uninsured) than children. Among adults, each 10% within-state increase in Medicaid prescriptions was associated with a 7.5% relative increase (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7%-9.3%) in Medicaid coverage; each 10% increase in cash-pay prescriptions was associated with a 2.5% increase (95% CI, 1.0%-4.1%) in uninsured rates. Conclusions: Real-time prescription drug data are moderately to highly correlated with state-level coverage changes in Medicaid and uninsured rates, particularly for adults. These data may be useful for timely assessments of upcoming policies affecting Medicaid coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.