ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Randomized communication nudges to increase primary care engagement among Medicaid enrollees in Maine.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the importance of primary care in disease prevention, few studies have examined behavioral interventions to increase primary care engagement. In partnership with the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, we implemented a randomized mail-based outreach strategy to connect newly enrolled adults in MaineCare Primary Care Case Management with primary care providers. From March 16, 2021, through January 1, 2022, members were randomized to receive either (1) a standard text-heavy outreach packet (control arm) or (2) the standard packet plus 2 visually simplified mailers that emphasized the value and low cost of a primary care check-up and listed a single primary care provider near the enrollee's home (intervention arm). We found that over 12 months of follow-up, the intervention had no significant effects on the rate or number of primary care visits, emergency department visits, or inpatient hospitalizations. We also observed no significant impact on Medicaid enrollment or recommended primary care services, including receipt of flu shots, cholesterol screenings, or mammograms. Results suggest that barriers targeted by the mailers were not primary drivers of primary care engagement, and other strategies are needed to help connect new Medicaid enrollees with primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.