Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42358433›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026

Japanese attitudes toward human brain organoid research: broad support amid ethical concerns.

Tsutomu Sawai, Mayu Koike, Masanori Kataoka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tsutomu SawaiGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.
Mayu KoikeSchool of Engineering, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masanori KataokaUehiro Division for Applied Ethics, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Human brain organoids are three-dimensional neural structures derived from human pluripotent and tissue stem cells. As the ethical implications of this research have sparked significant debate, it is essential to gauge public opinion to ensure that the research aligns with societal values and ethical standards. Methods: To understand public perceptions of human brain organoid research, we conducted an online survey targeting Japanese individuals. The survey explored expectations, concerns, and agreements regarding this type of research. Results: The results from 326 participants revealed high expectations especially for applied and clinical research but significant ethical concerns, particularly regarding unanticipated risks and commercialization. Moreover, comprehension test scores showed a weak positive correlation with support for various research objectives, indicating that informed individuals may view this type of research favorably. Discussion: Japanese citizens are generally supportive of human brain organoid research, yet various ethical concerns are identified as well. Our findings indicate that to foster responsible innovation in this field, public engagement and informed discussions are essential, which will dispel citizens' misconceptions and ensure that their views are meaningfully incorporated into research practices and future regulations.

Indexed as

bioethicsconsciousnessorganoidspublic opinionscience communication

Identifiers

PMID42358433
PMCPMC13293642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.