ReviewFrontiers in medical technology2026
Hospital efficiency assessment: a systematic review of DEA and hybrid DEA-machine learning approaches.
Review in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating Hospital Efficiency and Productivity: A Bootstrap-Corrected DEA and Malmquist Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing complexity of healthcare systems and growing resource constraints have made hospital efficiency assessment central to healthcare management and policy. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been widely used to evaluate hospital efficiency due to its ability to accommodate multiple input and output structures. However, classical DEA applications provide limited support for explaining efficiency scores, generating predictions, and informing managerial decision-making. This study systematically reviews hospital efficiency studies published between 2020 and 2025 to examine the use and limitations of DEA and to identify approaches integrating DEA with machine learning (ML). To more comprehensively demonstrate the methodological diversity of DEA-machine learning integration, studies from non-healthcare fields have also been included in the comparative analysis. Following PRISMA guidelines, standalone DEA and DEA-ML studies were analysed and coded across methodological dimensions. Multiple Correspondence Analysis was applied to identify dominant methodological configurations and emerging patterns in the literature. Findings indicate that CCR and BCC models remain prevalent, with human resources and financial indicators as common inputs and service delivery measures as outputs. DEA-ML research largely relies on two-stage structures focused on classification and prediction. The results highlight methodological gaps and the potential of more explainable and decision-support-oriented DEA-ML approaches to enhance benchmarking and resource allocation in hospital efficiency management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.