Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42358430›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medical technology2026

Hospital efficiency assessment: a systematic review of DEA and hybrid DEA-machine learning approaches.

Nesrin Alkan, Ubeyde Kaan Koluk, Bilal Baris Alkan, Alper Sinan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nesrin AlkanFaculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Ubeyde Kaan KolukFaculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Bilal Baris AlkanDepartment of Educational Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Alper SinanDepartment of Educational Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing complexity of healthcare systems and growing resource constraints have made hospital efficiency assessment central to healthcare management and policy. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been widely used to evaluate hospital efficiency due to its ability to accommodate multiple input and output structures. However, classical DEA applications provide limited support for explaining efficiency scores, generating predictions, and informing managerial decision-making. This study systematically reviews hospital efficiency studies published between 2020 and 2025 to examine the use and limitations of DEA and to identify approaches integrating DEA with machine learning (ML). To more comprehensively demonstrate the methodological diversity of DEA-machine learning integration, studies from non-healthcare fields have also been included in the comparative analysis. Following PRISMA guidelines, standalone DEA and DEA-ML studies were analysed and coded across methodological dimensions. Multiple Correspondence Analysis was applied to identify dominant methodological configurations and emerging patterns in the literature. Findings indicate that CCR and BCC models remain prevalent, with human resources and financial indicators as common inputs and service delivery measures as outputs. DEA-ML research largely relies on two-stage structures focused on classification and prediction. The results highlight methodological gaps and the potential of more explainable and decision-support-oriented DEA-ML approaches to enhance benchmarking and resource allocation in hospital efficiency management.

Indexed as

data envelopment analysisdecision-makinghospital efficiencymachine learningmultiple correspondence analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42358430
PMCPMC13290754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.