ArticleJournal of virus eradication2026
Maintaining versus switching antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients with low-level viremia.
Article in Journal of virus eradication, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Baseline low-level viremia in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: prognostic significance, risk stratification, and clinical implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of low-level viremia (LLV) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients receiving first-line nucleos(t)ide analogue (NAs) therapy with negative results on conventional HBV DNA testing is unknown. Methods: A total of 557 treatment-naïve CHB patients who had received first-line NAs therapy for more than 48 weeks and had negative results on conventional HBV DNA testing were enrolled. According to the results of two high-sensitivity HBV DNA tests, CHB patients were divided into two categories: maintained virological response (MVR) and LLV. Finally, LLV patients were divided into two groups: maintaining NAs therapy and switching NAs therapy. Results: Among the patients whose conventional HBV DNA testing was negative, the proportions of MVR and LLV were 64.1% and 35.9% respectively. Age and treatment duration are negatively correlated with the occurrence of LLV, while HBsAg level, HBeAg positivity, and ALT level were positively associated with the occurrence of LLV. At the 48th week of follow-up, the complete virological response (CVR) of the switching NAs group and the maintaining NAs group were 81.63% and 86.36% respectively ( Conclusion: In CHB patients who had negative results of conventional HBV DNA testing, the incidence rate of LLV is still high. For LLV patients with negative results in conventional HBV DNA testing, the vast majority of patients can achieve CVR whether maintaining or switching NAs, and the efficacy of the two treatment strategies is similar. However, these findings may not be applicable to patients with higher baseline HBV DNA levels, different distributions of NAs types, or those treated in other clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.