ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026
Oral Hygiene Interventions and Pneumonia Prevention in Critical Care: An Integrative Review of Evidence and Practice.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oral Hygiene Interventions and Pneumonia Prevention in Critical Care: An Integrative Review of Evidence and Practice.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NVHAP) remain among the most common and serious infections in adult critical care settings. Despite strong biological plausibility, oral care is inconsistently specified and rarely measured as a preventive strategy. This review synthesizes evidence on oral hygiene practices in critically ill adults, examines their relationship to VAP and NVHAP, and proposes a pragmatic and dentistry-informed oral-care bundle for clinical use. Methods: An integrative review was conducted using a structured literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from 2005 to 2025. Search terms combined pneumonia-related concepts, critical care setting and oral health. Eligible sources included studies addressing oral health and the prevention of VAP or NVHAP in adult critical care settings. Only full-text publications in English or with an available English translation were included. Results: The database search identified 935 records. After removing 224 duplicates, 711 studies were selected for title and abstract screening. Furthermore, studies focused exclusively on non-oral pneumonia prevention strategies, those without an oral health-related component, or those not conducted in an acute hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) setting were excluded during the synthesis phase, resulting in 20 studies included in the final synthesis. The evidence synthesis was conducted narratively, organized around domains corresponding to the review objectives such as pathophysiologic mechanisms along the oral-lung axis; current oral care practices; modality-specific interventions; assessment and documentation; implementation and workforce factors; safety, equity, and feasibility. Conclusion: Oral hygiene occupies a modifiable point along the oral-lung axis, where simple bedside interventions can reduce pneumonia risk; however, clinical practice remains heterogeneous and under-specified. Structured oral care practices reduce VAP incidence and represent a reliable and scalable contribution to safer critical and acute care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.