Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42358311›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

Nutritional and techno-functional enhancement of noodles through cricket powder incorporation: Implications for starch digestibility and flavor.

Yu Liu, Yang-Ran Lu, Rui-Xin Liu, Hua Li, Sirithon Siriamornpun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu LiuDepartment of Cuisine and Nutrition, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province 225127, China.
Yang-Ran LuDepartment of Cuisine and Nutrition, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province 225127, China.
Rui-Xin LiuDepartment of Cuisine and Nutrition, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province 225127, China.
Hua LiDepartment of Cuisine and Nutrition, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province 225127, China.
Sirithon SiriamornpunResearch Unit of Thai Food Innovation, Department of Food Technology and Nutrition, Mahasarakham University, Kantarawichai, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cricket powder (CP) offers a high-protein and sustainable alternative to more traditional animal-based protein sources. In this study, CP was incorporated into noodles at 3%, 6%, and 9% replacement levels to evaluate its effects on dough rheology, nutritional quality, structure, starch digestibility, antioxidant activity, and flavor properties. CP addition enhanced dough viscoelasticity. It also increased protein, fat, and total amino acids, while reducing carbohydrate content. These changes were accompanied by lower rapidly digestible starch and estimated glycemic index, and higher resistant starch. Structural analyses showed strengthened hydrogen bonding, reduced relative crystallinity, and partial disruption of the gluten-starch network at higher substitution levels. In addition, CP improved antioxidant capacity and promoted umami-related flavor compounds. Although cooking loss increased, it remained within acceptable limits. Different substitution levels exhibited distinct advantages in nutritional, technological, and sensory attributes, allowing product selection according to consumer preferences for taste, texture, and health value. Overall, CP can serve as a sustainable functional ingredient to improve the nutritional and techno-functional properties of noodles.

Indexed as

Cricket powderFlavor profileIn vitro digestionNoodleRheologySensory evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42358311
PMCPMC13292466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.