Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42358293›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Development and evaluation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for enteral feeding intolerance in sepsis patients.

Zhengang Wei, Congcong Liu, Jicheng Zhang, Xiaohua Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhengang WeiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Congcong LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Jicheng ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Xiaohua WangDepartment of Information Technology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early detection and prediction of enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) are essential for effective management of septic patients. This study seeks to develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for predicting EFI in septic patients. Methods: Data were collected from septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit and receiving enteral nutrition (EN) at a tertiary hospital in Shandong Province between January 2023 and July 2025. A retrospective cohort was randomly divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Feature selection was performed using univariate analysis and binary logistic regression. 5 independent ML models were developed and evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) method was applied to interpret the predictive model. Results: The study included 549 septic patients, with an EFI incidence of 34.6%. 6 key features were selected for model development: age, APACHE II score, albumin levels, receipt of continuous renal replacement therapy, EN start time, and intra-abdominal pressure. Among the models, the RF model demonstrated the best performance, with an AUROC of 0.891, accuracy of 0.830, F1 score of 0.771, specificity of 0.869, and sensitivity of 0.763. SHAP analysis identified albumin levels as a protective factor for EFI in septic patients. Conclusion: This model can serve as a tool to identify high-risk individuals with EFI among septic patients, facilitating clinical healthcare providers in delivering scientific and individualized EN therapy to patients.

Indexed as

enteral feeding intoleranceenteral nutritionmachine learningpredictive modelsepsis

Identifiers

PMID42358293
PMCPMC13290633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.