ArticleFrontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry2026
Psychosocial maturity and institutional confinement from ages 15-22: a longitudinal reciprocal model.
Article in Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Psychosocial maturity develops rapidly during adolescence and early adulthood and is closely linked to delinquency and justice system involvement. Although incarceration and psychosocial immaturity have each been studied, they are rarely examined together within a single developmental framework, and modeling only one direction may inflate estimated effects. Moreover, psychosocial maturity is typically treated as a global construct, despite meaningful variation across its core components. Methods: We analyzed data from the longitudinal Pathways to Desistance study ( Results: Lower psychosocial maturity predicted greater subsequent correctional time, and greater correctional time predicted slower-than-expected gains in psychosocial maturity. Standardized within-person effects were small but consistent across ages. Component-level analyses indicated that reciprocal associations were driven primarily by temperance. Conclusions: Initial incarceration driven by lower psychosocial maturity levels may foster heightened institutional contact that further disrupts normative developmental processes, particularly self-regulation. These findings support both importation and deprivation perspectives and provide empirical support for Moffitt's ensnarement hypothesis. Findings highlight the importance of jointly modeling developmental vulnerability and institutional exposure and underscore the role of self-regulatory capacities in justice system involvement. Developmental implications and juvenile justice policy are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.