ReviewLocal and regional anesthesia2026
In Search of Ideal Analgesia: Classical and Deep Rectus Sheath Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Review in Local and regional anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard of treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Despite its minimally invasive nature, LC is still associated with moderate postoperative pain that may delay early mobilization, oral intake, and discharge while increasing the need for opioids. Within ERAS protocols, multimodal analgesia using regional techniques has become increasingly important. The rectus sheath block (RSB) is considered a useful option for controlling the somatic pain component related to the periumbilical port site. Materials and Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify studies published up to 2026. The analyses included prospective randomized and non-randomized studies, retrospective case series, anatomical investigations, and expert recommendations. In addition to the classical RSB, the deep rectus sheath block (DRSB) was evaluated as a potentially relevant technique for addressing not only somatic but also peritoneum-related pain. Results: Classical RSB, performed by injecting local anesthetic between the rectus abdominis muscle and the posterior rectus sheath, provides effective analgesia in the periumbilical port area, reduces postoperative pain intensity, and decreases opioid consumption during the first 24 h after LC compared with wound infiltration or systemic analgesia alone. DRSB, which targets the preperitoneal plane between the posterior rectus sheath and parietal peritoneum, has shown promising analgesic effects in isolated clinical reports after LC and epigastric hernia repair, with possible benefits for peritoneum-related pain. However, the current evidence for DRSB remains limited to case reports and small case series, and its exact mechanism of action is still debated. Conclusion: RSB is a valuable component of multimodal analgesia for LC, with a demonstrated opioid-sparing effect and favorable safety profile under ultrasound guidance. DRSB appears promising, but remains experimental. Further well-designed randomized trials are needed to define its indications, optimal technique, and role in standardized analgesic protocols for LC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.