ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
Evolution of the humanitarian roster system for sexual and reproductive health.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence suggests that the number, scale, and severity of emergencies exceed the international humanitarian system's existing capacity and available resources to meet humanitarian needs, especially for the health sector of which sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is an essential component. Since 1997, the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises's Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for SRH has been the standard of care for SRH interventions in emergencies, aimed to protect the health, dignity, and rights of women and girls living in humanitarian emergencies. Humanitarian response organisations, national governments, and donors increasingly recognise the importance of MISP implementation at the onset of an emergency. However, an effective humanitarian response demands rapid mobilisation of resources, including the deployment of trained professionals capable of navigating complex scenarios. Roster systems are a human resource tool that maintains a diverse range of qualified professional profiles for emergency preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. Recent trends indicate a shift from a global to an increasingly geographic-specific roster management and recruitment model, which we argue is vital in localising and sustaining humanitarian response. Organisations should channel investments into further strengthening national and regional response capacities, including community-level readiness for SRH, and reconsider international standby roster models. As first responders, communities are best positioned to initiate community-based responses when integrated into all levels of health disaster risk management systems. Fostering robust partnerships between international, regional, national, sub-national, and community levels is critical to ensuring preparedness and response efforts for SRH, resilient recovery strategies, and building back better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.