ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Temperate forest heterogeneity decreases local and landscape-scale spider diversity through habitat filtering despite increasing species turnover.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temperate forest heterogeneity decreases local and landscape-scale spider diversity through habitat filtering despite increasing species turnover.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spiders are important arthropod predators in temperate forests. Their diversity depends on structurally heterogeneous habitats offering diverse microhabitats. Yet, modern silviculture has homogenized temperate forest structure at local and landscape scales. The consequences of this homogenization for landscape-level spider diversity, however, remain largely unknown. We sampled spiders using pitfall traps across 234 patches in a large-scale, replicated field experiment at 11 forest sites across Germany. At each site, one treatment district was experimentally heterogenized through canopy gap creation, thinning and deadwood enrichment, and a second homogeneous district remained untreated as a control. We applied a novel meta-analytic framework to compare α-, β- and γ-diversity of spiders between treatment and control districts, standardized for sample coverage along Hill numbers giving increasing weight to abundance and included taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity facets. We also investigated spider community assembly in response to deadwood enrichment, canopy openness and heterogeneous forest structure. Based on 18,540 spider individuals from 206 species, treatment districts exhibited significantly lower γ- and α-diversity across all diversity facets and Hill numbers, particularly when focusing on rare species (q = 0). In contrast, β-diversity increased in treatment districts for phylogenetic and functional diversity across Hill numbers (q = 0, 1, 2). The simultaneous decrease in α- and γ-diversity despite higher β-diversity renders the increase in compositional turnover insufficient to compensate for local diversity losses. Although spiders were more abundant in treatment patches, habitat filtering, rather than niche competition, shaped the community. Our findings corroborate previous results of high spider abundances but lower taxonomic and functional diversity in canopy gaps due to strong habitat filtering effects. However, we demonstrate for the first time that this lower α-diversity is linked to a lower γ-diversity despite increases in β-diversity. Homogenous forests support higher γ-diversity through greater three-dimensional canopy habitat availability. Yet, failure to account for species frequencies using Hill numbers and coverage standardization may result in a substantial underestimation of arboreal spider diversity in pitfall traps. Nonetheless, higher abundances in heterogeneous forests point towards increased prey availability and predator pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.