Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42357949›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2026

Pre-qualifications, learning strategies, and study satisfaction among medical students: insights from a multicenter German study.

Carla Schröpel, Anne Herrmann-Werner, Teresa Festl-Wietek, Tim Wittenberg, Sabine C Herpertz, Katrin Schüttpelz-Brauns, Andrea Heinzmann, Tobias Böckers, Stephan Zipfel, Rebecca Erschens

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carla SchröpelUniversity Medical Hospital Tübingen, Internal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-4953-8815
Anne Herrmann-WernerTIME -Tübingen Institute for Medical Education, Medical Faculty, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2413-7047
Teresa Festl-WietekTIME -Tübingen Institute for Medical Education, Medical Faculty, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1450-1757
Tim WittenbergheiTEST-Department, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Sabine C HerpertzDepartment of General Psychiatry, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin Schüttpelz-BraunsMedical Education Research Department, Division for Study and Teaching Development, Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University.
Andrea HeinzmannAlbert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Medical Faculty, Office of the Dean of Studies, Freiburg, Germany.
Tobias BöckersOffice of the Dean of Studies, Medical Faculty, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1486-8535
Stephan ZipfelUniversity Medical Hospital Tübingen, Internal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1659-4440
Rebecca ErschensUniversity Medical Hospital Tübingen, Internal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4433-9378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough medical students with pre-medical qualifications (e.g., paramedic training) may enhance diversity within the student body, they have received little attention in international research. Their prior experience may influence study satisfaction through different learning strategies or working alongside their studies. This study investigates how pre-qualifications relate to three dimensions of study satisfaction (content, conditions, and coping with study load) and examines whether deep-processing learning strategies (elaboration and critical thinking) and part-time employment help explain these associations.

methodThe authors conducted a cross-sectional survey at five German medical schools across different stages of study (3rd, 6th and 10th semester, final year). A structural equation model tested (a) whether pre-qualifications (i.e., academic degree, vocational training in the medical field) moderated the relationship between deep-processing strategies and study satisfaction and (b) whether part-time employment mediated the relationship between pre-qualifications and study satisfaction, controlling for age, gender, undergraduate GPA, semester, and medical school.

resultsAssociations between deep-processing strategies and satisfaction did not differ by pre-qualifications. Regardless of students' pre-qualifications, elaboration was positively (ß = .51) and critical thinking negatively (ß = -.31) associated with satisfaction with study contents. Students with vocational training or prior academic degree more often worked part-time to finance studies; part-time employment was associated with lower satisfaction with study conditions (ß = -.07) but higher satisfaction with coping with study load (ß = .08). Indirect effects via part-time employment were significant but small. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that elaboration may be a particularly relevant learning strategy for satisfaction with study contents, regardless of students' prior professional or academic qualifications. The negative association between critical thinking and satisfaction highlights the complexity of students' perceptions of study contents. Although associations involving part-time employment were small, the findings contribute to a better understanding of students with professional and academic pre-qualifications and may inform efforts to support increasingly diverse medical student populations.

Indexed as

LearningPersonal SatisfactionStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleGermanyHumansMaleThinkingYoung Adultlearning strategiesMedical studentspart-time employmentprior qualificationsstudy satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42357949
PMCPMC13312842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.