ArticleMedical education online2026
Pre-qualifications, learning strategies, and study satisfaction among medical students: insights from a multicenter German study.
Article in Medical education online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough medical students with pre-medical qualifications (e.g., paramedic training) may enhance diversity within the student body, they have received little attention in international research. Their prior experience may influence study satisfaction through different learning strategies or working alongside their studies. This study investigates how pre-qualifications relate to three dimensions of study satisfaction (content, conditions, and coping with study load) and examines whether deep-processing learning strategies (elaboration and critical thinking) and part-time employment help explain these associations.
methodThe authors conducted a cross-sectional survey at five German medical schools across different stages of study (3rd, 6th and 10th semester, final year). A structural equation model tested (a) whether pre-qualifications (i.e., academic degree, vocational training in the medical field) moderated the relationship between deep-processing strategies and study satisfaction and (b) whether part-time employment mediated the relationship between pre-qualifications and study satisfaction, controlling for age, gender, undergraduate GPA, semester, and medical school.
resultsAssociations between deep-processing strategies and satisfaction did not differ by pre-qualifications. Regardless of students' pre-qualifications, elaboration was positively (ß = .51) and critical thinking negatively (ß = -.31) associated with satisfaction with study contents. Students with vocational training or prior academic degree more often worked part-time to finance studies; part-time employment was associated with lower satisfaction with study conditions (ß = -.07) but higher satisfaction with coping with study load (ß = .08). Indirect effects via part-time employment were significant but small. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that elaboration may be a particularly relevant learning strategy for satisfaction with study contents, regardless of students' prior professional or academic qualifications. The negative association between critical thinking and satisfaction highlights the complexity of students' perceptions of study contents. Although associations involving part-time employment were small, the findings contribute to a better understanding of students with professional and academic pre-qualifications and may inform efforts to support increasingly diverse medical student populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.