Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42357815›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026

Prognostic Factors for Postoperative Complications. An Aggregate Protocol for 10 Observational Studies From the Danish TRIPLE-A Cohort of 1.2 Million Surgeries.

Anders Peder Højer Karlsen, Asta Prescott, Caroline Folkersen, Jens Laigaard, Atena Saito, Caroline Lando Klammer, Mik Wetterslev, Emil Ipsen Ørskov, Mathilde Fahrendorff, Rebecca Kiær and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Anders Peder Højer KarlsenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0338-3751
Asta PrescottDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Caroline FolkersenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0783-3931
Jens LaigaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-3769
Atena SaitoDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3023-3812
Caroline Lando KlammerDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mik WetterslevDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emil Ipsen ØrskovDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6166-923X
Mathilde FahrendorffDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rebecca KiærDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helene Holm LaigaardDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6782-9706
Nichlas HovmandDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Hyldborg LundstrømDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-1433
Sebastian Buhl RasmussenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3990-2197
Anders Kehlet NørskovDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6908-7832
Markus Harboe OlsenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, the Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0981-0723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative complications substantially increase morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Understanding prognostic factors is essential for risk stratification, targeted prevention strategies, and development of prediction models.

objectivesTo identify prognostic factors for 18 major postoperative complications in 10 studied domains using the Danish TRIPLE-A database: (1) acute postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, and need for rescue opioids; (2) persistent opioid use; (3) acute kidney injury; (4) venous thromboembolism; (5) staphylococcal surgical site infection and infections requiring antibiotic treatment; (6) three airway management complications; (7) transfusion requirements; (8) delirium; (9) new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation; and (10) readmission, reoperation and unplanned ICU admission.

methodsWe will conduct 10 retrospective cohort studies using electronic health record data from 1.2 million surgical procedures performed in the Capital and Zealand Regions of Denmark from 2017 to 2025. Each individual complication will be identified via validated combinations of ICD-10 codes, medication administration, laboratory values, radiology examinations, and free-text mining of clinical notes. Candidate prognostic factors will be selected a priori based on literature review and clinical expertise, and will encompass patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical characteristics, anaesthetic management, vital parameters and biomarkers. We will estimate adjusted associations between candidate prognostic factors and complications using multivariable logistic regression with LASSO penalisation to reduce overfitting. Effect estimates will be reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and the relative contribution of predictors will be assessed by changes in model discrimination (Δ-AUC). The approach for surgical procedure, calendar year, and hospital site will be determined for each study (adjustment, stratification, or inclusion as candidate predictors).

conclusionThese studies aim to validate established prognostic factors and identify novel ones for major postoperative complications, providing a foundation for the development of individualised perioperative risk stratification models.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsCohort StudiesDenmarkHumansPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42357815
PMCPMC13305150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.