ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2026
Impact of multimodal analgesia using intravenous non-opioid agents on immediate postoperative rescue analgesic use following minor general surgery: a retrospective study.
Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intraoperative multimodal analgesia with non-opioid agents is standard in perioperative pain management. However, evidence directly comparing triple, dual, and single agent regimens remains limited. Methods: This retrospective single-center study analyzed adult patients undergoing minor general surgery, setting in which opioids are not routinely employed for postoperative pain management. The primary outcome was the use of rescue analgesics within 4 hours after surgery, comparing triple (acetaminophen [AAP] + nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs] + nefopam), dual (AAP + NSAIDs, AAP + nefopam, or NSAIDs + nefopam), and single agent regimens. Comparisons among individual dual agent combinations and among individual single agents were performed as secondary analyses. Outcomes were estimated using multivariable regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: Among 5,601 patients included, 37.9% received single, 58.5% dual, and 3.6% triple agent regimens. Rescue analgesic use occurred in 75.1%, 58.8%, and 43.8% of these groups, respectively. After IPTW adjustment, the triple regimen was associated with significantly lower rescue analgesic use compared with dual regimens (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.70; Conclusions: Triple agent intraoperative non-opioid analgesia was associated with the greatest reduction in postoperative rescue analgesic use, with a stepwise benefit observed across single, dual, and triple regimens. These findings support the active use of multimodal non-opioid analgesia in minor general surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.