Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42357788›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2026

Part 2: A Sector-Wide Survey of UK/British Isles Shelter Organisations Caring for Cats: Caregiver-Reported Approaches to Assessments, Behaviour Management and Homing Decisions.

Lauren R Finka, Ana M Barcelos, James Waterman, Avni Bhatia, Jenni L McDonald, Rae Foreman-Worsley, Beth Skillings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren R FinkaFeline Welfare Research Team, Cats Protection, National Cat Centre, Haywards Heath RH17 7TT, UK.
Ana M BarcelosFeline Welfare Research Team, Cats Protection, National Cat Centre, Haywards Heath RH17 7TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2727-5058
James WatermanFeline Welfare Research Team, Cats Protection, National Cat Centre, Haywards Heath RH17 7TT, UK.
Avni BhatiaFeline Welfare Research Team, Cats Protection, National Cat Centre, Haywards Heath RH17 7TT, UK.
Jenni L McDonaldFeline Welfare Research Team, Cats Protection, National Cat Centre, Haywards Heath RH17 7TT, UK.
Rae Foreman-WorsleyFeline Welfare Research Team, Cats Protection, National Cat Centre, Haywards Heath RH17 7TT, UK.
Beth SkillingsFeline Welfare Research Team, Cats Protection, National Cat Centre, Haywards Heath RH17 7TT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shelter organisations take responsibility for the care, assessment and homing of large numbers of domestic cats from diverse backgrounds. However, not all cats that come under shelter care are suited to close human-cohabitation or to certain types of human-domestic lifestyles. Shelter stakeholders may undertake decision-making processes to determine how each cat should be managed and where they should go next. These processes may lead to different cat welfare experiences and long-term outcomes depending on how they occur, yet little is known about current approaches. The aim of this study was to characterise current approaches to cat and adopter assessments, behaviour management and homing decisions across the British Isles shelter sector, considering reported practices against sector minimum standards where applicable. A total of 393 quantitative and qualitative responses from employees and volunteers were received. Responses indicated that overall, stakeholders were consistently undertaking cat and prospective adopter assessments, with subsequent information used to support cat management, decision-making and homing. However, the degree of standardisation and objectivity associated with these processes was unclear, with considerable variation in approaches, including certain practices potentially associated with poor cat welfare outcomes identified. Examples include exposure to stressful handling and behavioural interventions and assessment 'tests', prolonged stays for harder-to-home cats and potentially suboptimal homing decisions for cats not suited to domestic 'pet' lifestyles. Identified opportunities to support welfare-friendly processes at the individual level include more consistent use of cats' within-shelter behavioural presentations as grounds for 'pet'-suitability assessments, and careful and consistent application of cat-labelling and terminology. It is also recommended that care is taken to ensure methods of cat assessments, behavioural interventions and homing decisions are pragmatic and optimised to positive cat welfare outcomes.

Indexed as

domestic catFelis catusferal catsrehomingrescuestray catsunowned catswelfare

Identifiers

PMID42357788
PMCPMC13307826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.