Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42357774›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2026

Assessment of Colostrum Quality in Cattle Using Viscosity Measurements.

Florian Schneider, Theresa Conze, Kathrin Büttner, Axel Wehrend

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Florian SchneiderVeterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Frankfurter Strasse 106, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Theresa ConzeVeterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Frankfurter Strasse 106, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Kathrin BüttnerUnit of Biomathematics and Data Processing, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Frankfurter Strasse 95, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Axel WehrendVeterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig University, Frankfurter Strasse 106, 35392 Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The provision of high-quality colostrum immediately after birth is essential to ensure adequate passive transfer of immunity in neonatal calves. This study evaluated colostrum viscosity as a potential indicator of colostrum quality, its relationship with immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration, and the influence of cryopreservation on viscosity measurements. Viscosity was determined in 200 colostrum samples using a cone-plate viscometer and an outflow funnel. IgG concentrations were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Viscosity measured by the plate-cone viscometer averaged 19.33 ± 22.98 cP. No significant differences were observed between viscosity measurements obtained before freezing and after thawing. Flow times through the outflow funnel averaged 18.48 ± 4.27 s. The mean IgG concentration determined by ELISA was 63.89 ± 23.50 mg/mL. Significant positive correlations were identified between viscosity and IgG concentration, between flow time and IgG concentration, and between viscosity and flow time. ROC analysis of the funnel method yielded an AUC of 0.821 (95% CI: 0.752-0.890), indicating good diagnostic performance for identifying poor-quality colostrum (IgG < 50 mg/mL). These findings indicate that viscosity using either a cone-plate viscometer or an outflow funnel is a useful proxy for IgG concentration and may serve as a practical method for assessing colostrum quality. Furthermore, cryopreservation had no detectable effect on colostrum viscosity.

Indexed as

cattlecolostrumoutflow funnelviscosity

Identifiers

PMID42357774
PMCPMC13307875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.