Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42357756›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2026

Assessment of Sulfite Residues in Shrimp from Moroccan Fisheries: Implications for Food Safety and Regulatory Compliance.

Ghizlane Larif, Nourredine Bouchriti, Rachid Khatouf, Oleya El Hariri, Said Dahani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ghizlane LarifDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health-Food Safety Unit, Hassan II Agronomic and Veterinary Institute, Rabat 10112, Morocco.
Nourredine BouchritiDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health-Food Safety Unit, Hassan II Agronomic and Veterinary Institute, Rabat 10112, Morocco.
Rachid KhatoufDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health-Food Safety Unit, Hassan II Agronomic and Veterinary Institute, Rabat 10112, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0003-4881-2123
Oleya El HaririLaboratory of Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Health and Environment, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University Ibn Tofail, Kenitra 14000, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0002-2598-6916
Said DahaniDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health-Food Safety Unit, Hassan II Agronomic and Veterinary Institute, Rabat 10112, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring chemical residue levels in foods of animal origin is essential to ensure food safety and protect consumer health. Sulfites are commonly used in crustaceans to preserve quality; however, excessive levels may raise public health concerns, particularly for sensitive individuals. This study aimed to assess the compliance of shrimp from offshore and coastal fisheries in Morocco with current regulatory standards. A total of 60 samples were collected and analyzed for residual sulfite levels using the semi-quantitative strip test method. The results showed that sulfite concentrations ranged from 5 to 100 mg/kg in offshore samples, with a mean value of 41 mg/kg. Higher concentrations were observed in coastal samples, with an average of 172 mg/kg. Despite the observed differences between fishing origins, most samples complied with the established regulatory limits. These results support the importance of systematic monitoring programs within the fisheries supply chain to strengthen food safety control and contribute to veterinary public health protection.

Indexed as

chemical residuescrustaceansfood safetymelanosisregulatory complianceshrimpsulfitesveterinary public health

Identifiers

PMID42357756
PMCPMC13308157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.