ReviewViruses2026
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors (HDACis) as Latency-Reversing Agents in HIV Cure Strategies: Chemistry, Selectivity, and Clinical Perspective.
Review in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epigenetic regulation of HIV-1 transcription: insights into latency mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Latently infected resting CD4+ T cells represent the principal barrier to HIV eradication. Their immunological quiescence renders them invisible to combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and host immune surveillance, sustaining a reservoir that mandates lifelong treatment. The 'shock and kill' strategy seeks to reverse this latency using pharmacological latency-reversing agents (LRAs) so that immune effectors and cART can eliminate reactivated cells. In this narrative, structured review, we examine histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) as LRAs from a medicinal chemistry perspective. The review places particular emphasis on structure-activity relationship (SAR), isoform selectivity, and the mechanistic basis of differential clinical performance, synthesizing evidence from preclinical, ex vivo, and clinical studies published between 2010 and 2026. Four structural classes of HDACis-hydroxamic acids, benzamides, cyclic depsipeptides, and short-chain fatty acids-differ substantially in isoform selectivity, potency, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability. No single agent has achieved statistically significant reservoir reduction in clinical trials, highlighting the apparent inadequacy of the 'shock' phase alone and suggesting a need for complementary 'kill' strategies. Rational design of HDACis informed by isoform-selective SAR, combined with emerging combination LRA strategies and immunological 'kill' components, represents a promising direction toward a functional HIV cure, though substantial translational hurdles remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.