ArticleViruses2026
Molecular Epidemiology of Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Rhinovirus in Santander, Colombia, During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Periods, 2020-2024.
Article in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and rhinovirus (RV) are major causes of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) worldwide. The circulation of both RSV and RV was notably altered during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyzed the epidemiological and molecular characteristics of RSV and RV in Santander, Colombia, during the pandemic period (PP, 2020-2021) and the post-pandemic period (PPP, 2023-2024). A total of 921 respiratory samples from patients with ARIs were screened for RSV-A/B and RV. Sequences of the RSV attachment glycoprotein (G) gene and the RV VP4-VP2 region were analyzed in positive samples. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the study population were also assessed. RSV was not detected during PP, whereas RV was detected in 4.8% of samples. During PPP, RSV-A, RSV-B, and RV were detected in 5.6%, 4.4%, and 28.0% of samples, respectively. RSV infections were mainly identified in children, while RV was detected across all age groups. RSV-A sequences grouped within seven A.D-derived lineages (A.D.1.5, A.D.1.7, A.D.1.8, A.D.3.2, A.D.3.3, A.D.5.1, A.D.5.2), whereas RSV-B sequences clustered within the B.D.E.1 lineage. RV showed a higher number of detected genotypes during the PPP than during the PP. The genotypic characterization performed in this study provides new insight into the molecular epidemiology of RSV and RV in Santander, Colombia, during PP and PPP, and represents, to our knowledge, the first regional description of RSV lineages and RV genotypes across these periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.