Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42357666›Full record

ArticleViruses2026

ViroBioTree: A Tree-Structured Biological Evidence Retrieval Framework for Viral Protein Function Annotation.

Tinglian Lai, Fuguo Liu, Guodong Li, Liyan Hua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tinglian LaiSchool of Mathematics and Computational Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
Fuguo LiuSchool of Mathematics and Data Science, Changji University, Changji 831100, China.
Guodong LiGuangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Data Analysis and Computation, School of Mathematics and Computing Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541002, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1275-2982
Liyan HuaSchool of Mathematics and Computational Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi province Grant No. 2026GXNSFAA00640099the Science and Technology Project of Guangxi Guike AD25069086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate viral protein function annotation is essential for genomic surveillance, yet conventional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines often fragment biological evidence into fixed-length text chunks, disrupting relationships among ORFs, annotations, structural domains, sequence motifs, residue mappings, and model-derived attention evidence. We propose ViroBioTree, a tree-structured biological evidence retrieval framework for downstream viral protein evidence review rather than a new primary annotation classifier. Built as an evidence organization layer on ViralMultiNet-derived ORF-level predictions and annotations, ViroBioTree converts sequence, annotation, structure, and attention evidence into typed biological nodes and traceable edges, then performs deterministic multi-channel recall, evidence-aware reranking, balanced TopK selection, rule-based verification, and node-cited report generation. In a demo benchmark, ViroBioTree achieved its strongest deterministic proxy performance on structure-explanation tasks, with Precision@K = 1.0, Recall@K = 1.0, and diversity = 0.52; these values reflect expected node-type and tag agreement rather than independent biological correctness. A bounded full-scale SARS-CoV-2 index contained 39,800 ORF rows, 80,000 attention records, 199,418 nodes, and 495,886 edges. In a stratified full20k diagnostic evaluation, ViroBioTree showed task-dependent advantages over LlamaIndex vector retrieval for conflict detection, evidence retrieval, and structure explanation, while LlamaIndex remained competitive or stronger for annotation-rich function annotation. A cross-family Influenza A Virus (IAV) diagnostic audit showed that the schema can represent IAV evidence namespaces while explicitly exposing missing formal ORF inputs, missing attention evidence, and unavailable residue/PDB assertions. Supplementary robustness, external sanity-check, diversity-risk, expert-evaluation, domain-tool positioning, and cross-family audit analyses supported traceability, report quality, and conservative evidence handling, but also showed that stable Precision@K under query perturbation does not necessarily imply stable retrieved evidence sets. ViroBioTree operates offline and deterministically, but does not address raw-read assembly, base calling, primary ORF prediction, or wet-lab validation. Its results should be interpreted as proxy and expert-reviewed evidence for traceable viral protein evidence retrieval and report generation rather than as direct validation of biological function annotation.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMolecular Sequence AnnotationSoftwareViral ProteinsGenome, ViralHumansOpen Reading FramesSARS-CoV-2Viral Proteinsbiological tree indexcross-family diagnostic auditevidence retrievalevidence verificationInfluenza A Virusretrieval-augmented generationSARS-CoV-2traceable annotationviral protein function annotationwastewater metagenomics

Identifiers

PMID42357666
PMCPMC13307837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.