Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42357581›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Covalent Inhibitors in Antimicrobial Drug Development-Beyond β-Lactams.

Ghazaleh Jafari, Dustin Duncan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ghazaleh JafariDepartment of Chemistry, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-0082-8995
Dustin DuncanDepartment of Chemistry, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1240-8495

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2025-04514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For nearly a century, since the discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming, we have used covalent inhibitors as antimicrobial drugs. The success of penicillin in treating microbial infections led to numerous other antibiotics containing β-lactam, the reactive warhead that forms the covalent adduct, exemplified by later-generation cephalosporins with approvals into 2020. In parallel, early non-β-lactam covalent agents also emerged, extending covalent mechanisms beyond β-lactam antibacterials to antifungal, antiparasitic, and antiviral applications. Despite the successes of covalent mechanisms of action, there are still considerable safety concerns due to the possibility of off-target covalent adducts which may lead to significant side effects. This review provides an overview of non-β-lactam covalent antimicrobials across all major pathogen classes, organized by their warhead class, covalency, and resistance mechanisms, and outlines design and clinical-level mitigation strategies. We trace the field from the serendipitous discovery of penicillin to the intentional design of new drugs, with a discussion of changes in perception and evolution of technology that enable modern covalent drug design.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agentsbeta-LactamsDrug DevelopmentAnimalsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta Lactam AntibioticsDrug DesignHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsbeta Lactam Antibioticsbeta-Lactamsantibacterialantifungalantiparasiticantiviralchemical biologycovalent inhibitordrug developmentdrug discovery

Identifiers

PMID42357581
PMCPMC13304705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.