Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42357424›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Structural Knowledge Is What Matters in Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.

Natàlia Segura-Alabart, Francesc Serratosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natàlia Segura-AlabartDepartament d'Enginyeria Informàtica i Mateàtiques, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6276-2049
Francesc SerratosaDepartament d'Enginyeria Informàtica i Mateàtiques, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6112-5913

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2022-138327OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binding affinity prediction is about estimating the degree to which a drug binds to a protein. Predicting the binding affinity between a drug and a protein in a computational process helps researchers filter huge libraries of compounds before performing expensive biochemical lab experiments. Currently, there is interest in predicting binding affinity through computational pattern recognition or machine learning methods instead of the classical physics-inspired methods, which are computationally intractable except for tiny chemical compounds. In the last five years, several machine learning-based methods have been presented, whose experimental validations have achieved increasing Pearson coefficients while trained and tested in the PDBBind 2016 and CASF 2016 databases, respectively. These methods have an important diversity of architectures that provide different properties. The aim of this paper is to discern which binary properties (existence or absence) of these methods make them return higher Pearson coefficients. Basically, the properties introduced are related to the level of structural knowledge, the presence of 3D information, and the introduction of the relationship between the drug and the protein in the input of the model. The

Indexed as

ProteinsBinding SitesDatabases, ProteinLigandsMachine LearningModels, MolecularPrediction AlgorithmsProtein BindingLigandsProteinsattributed graphbinding affinity predictionCASF 2016Graph Neural NetworksPDBBind 2016pIC50

Identifiers

PMID42357424
PMCPMC13304565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.