ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparative Structural Modeling Suggests Distinct Signatures of Conformational Plasticity and Surface Physicochemistry in Phytoene Synthase and Dehydrosqualene Synthase.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carotenoids are essential metabolites involved in photosynthesis, cellular protection, pigmentation, and antioxidant activities. Phytoene synthase (PSY/CrtB) utilizes C20 substrates in carotenoid biosynthesis, whereas its structural homolog, dehydrosqualene synthase (CrtM), preferentially accepts C15 substrates. Although previous studies have identified CrtM mutations that expand substrate scope, the molecular basis of substrate discrimination in PSY/CrtB remains poorly understood, largely because of the absence of experimentally determined three-dimensional structures. Here, we integrated comparative sequence analysis, homology modeling, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the structural basis of substrate discrimination in PSY/CrtB. Comparative sequence analysis suggested distinct overall conservation landscapes in PSY/CrtB and CrtM, with 20 highly conserved positions shared between them and clustered around the catalytic core. MD simulations suggest that PSY models exhibit minimal differentiation under cross-ligand conditions, consistent with its greater conformational plasticity. Surface property analysis suggested hydrophobic patches and an amphipathic helix (Helix-13) in PSY that were preferentially conserved in PSY homologs relative to CrtM homologs. Taken together, our analyses suggest that greater conformational plasticity may facilitate the accommodation of C20 substrates in PSY and that its conserved hydrophobic surface architecture may shape its surface physicochemistry. These findings suggest that differences in substrate accommodation between PSY/CrtB and CrtM may reflect coordinated variation in conformational dynamics, pocket hydrophobicity, and surface architecture, rather than substantial alterations to the conserved catalytic core.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.