ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Plant-Derived Peptide-Polymer Therapeutics for Cutaneous Infections and Inflammation: Mechanistic Basis, Delivery Design and Translational Considerations.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous infections and chronic inflammatory wounds remain difficult to treat because antimicrobial resistance, polymicrobial biofilms, excessive protease activity, oxidative stress, and impaired barrier repair collectively reduce the effectiveness of conventional topical therapies. Plant-derived antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and peptide-associated bioactives offer antimicrobial, antibiofilm, immunomodulatory, and tissue reparative potential; however, their clinical translation is limited by proteolytic instability, poor stratum corneum penetration, short cutaneous residence time, formulation variability, cytotoxicity risks and limited human evidence. The key research gap is the lack of an integrated translational framework linking plant-derived peptide bioactivity with polymer engineering, advanced delivery systems, skin microenvironment biology, manufacturability, and regulatory feasibility. This review aims to critically evaluate the design principles, therapeutic mechanisms, delivery platforms, and translational barriers of plant-based peptide-polymer therapeutics for cutaneous infection and inflammation. We summarize major classes of plant-derived antimicrobial peptides, including defensins, cyclotides, thionins, hevein-like peptides, snakins, lipid transfer proteins, and knottin-type scaffolds, and examine engineering strategies such as self-assembly, aromatic N-capping, PEGylation, lipidation, dendritic architectures, and stimuli-responsive conjugation. We further discuss topical matrices, nanocarriers, liposomes, electrospun fibers, and surface-tethered biomaterials as delivery platforms for improving peptide stability, local retention, and controlled release. Finally, we identify key translational bottlenecks, including selectivity, toxicity, scalability, batch reproducibility, regulatory classification, and insufficient clinical validation. Mechanism-driven peptide optimization, quality-by-design manufacturing, standardized preclinical models, and controlled clinical trials will be essential for advancing these systems toward safe and effective dermatological therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.