ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Biomaterial-Assisted Strategies in Corneal Endothelial Cell Therapy: Toward a Platform-Based Approach.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corneal endothelial dysfunction is a major cause of corneal blindness worldwide. This is primarily due to the limited regenerative capacity of human corneal endothelial cells (CECs) and the global shortage of donor tissues. Corneal endothelial cell therapy (CECT), which involves injecting cultured CECs into the anterior chamber, has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional transplantation. However, its clinical efficacy remains limited by several factors, including rapid cell loss, non-uniform distribution, and insufficient long-term adhesion following injection. Recent advances in biomaterials and regenerative engineering have led to the development of emerging biomaterial-assisted strategies aimed at addressing these challenges. In this review, we provide a mechanistic and translational overview of next-generation CECT, highlighting a range of biomaterial-assisted strategies aimed at improving cell retention, spatial localization, and long-term adhesion following injection. These emerging approaches aim to mitigate key limitations of conventional cell injection therapy, including variability in cell distribution and retention. However, their effectiveness and translational feasibility remain under active investigation. In addition, we analyze recent global patent trends, regulatory frameworks, and market dynamics to highlight emerging opportunities for innovation and development in this field. Although many of these technologies remain at the preclinical or early translational stage, these approaches may provide a promising direction to improve engraftment efficiency, reduce surgical variability, and enable more scalable, minimally invasive treatment options. This review highlights the potential of biomaterial-assisted CECT as a next-generation regenerative strategy and outlines key challenges that must be overcome for successful clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.