Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42357035›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Influence of Reprocessing on the Properties of PVC-Based Wood-Plastic Composites.

Dario Pervan, Mladen Brezović, Nikola Španić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dario PervanFaculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 23, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Mladen BrezovićFaculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 23, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Nikola ŠpanićFaculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska Cesta 23, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-0125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reprocessing of wood-plastic composites (WPCs) significantly affects their structural integrity and thermal behavior. Despite this, the effect of reprocessing on PVC-based WPCs has not been extensively investigated, and the mechanism is not well understood. This study evaluated the effect of reprocessing on the properties of a PVC-based WPC. Small pieces of extruded WPC boards (2-4 mesh) were first milled to a granulation of 50 mesh, and then the material was reprocessed by compression molding, with part of the samples reinforced with glass- and carbon-fiber fabric. The physical and mechanical properties of the reprocessed material were analyzed, and the chemical and thermal characteristics of the reprocessed WPC were compared with the virgin WPC. The results of the mechanical and physical property tests showed that the reprocessed WPC had satisfactory properties compared with the virgin WPC. Samples reinforced with carbon-fiber fabric showed a statistically significant increase in tensile and flexural strength in comparison with unreinforced reprocessed WPC samples. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed that partial dehydrochlorination, thermal degradation and a decrease in thermal stability occurred. Overall, the results of this study show that although chemical degradation and a decrease in thermal stability were present in the reprocessed WPC, it retained satisfactory mechanical and physical properties that could be improved by reinforcing it with carbon-fiber fabric.

Indexed as

chemical characterizationmechanical propertiesphysical propertiespolyvinyl chloridereprocessingthermal characterizationwood–plastic composite

Identifiers

PMID42357035
PMCPMC13306233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.