ArticlePolymers2026
Green Extraction of Microcrystalline Cellulose from Rice Straw and Determination of Its Reinforcing Capacity in PHBV Films.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rice straw is a highly produced agricultural waste with a high cellulose content, which can be used as a cellulose source. Nevertheless, more sustainable extraction and purification strategies are needed to reduce the consumption of chemicals during the production of cellulose-derived materials. In this way, an integrated method based on subcritical water extraction and bleaching with hydrogen peroxide was used for isolating cellulose from rice straw. The cellulose fibres obtained were converted into microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) by applying acid hydrolysis with HCl 2N at 60 °C to reduce the fibre amorphous fraction. High cellulose purity (86%) and crystallinity (67%) were obtained in the isolated fibres. The influence of high-shear homogenisation (12,000 rpm) during hydrolysis was analysed, compared to mild stirring (350 rpm) at different times (30 and 60 min). High-shear homogenisation greatly accelerated the hydrolysis process of the amorphous fraction of the fibres, contributing to the reduction in particle size (to about 10 µm), defibration, increased crystallinity (70-72%), and shorter cellulose chains (92,400-61,600 g/mol) for a given treatment time. After 30-60 min of treatment, the resulting MCCs exhibited properties within the range reported for commercial AVICEL, with greater reinforcing performance in PHBV films. These MCCs resulted in lower water vapour permeability, while improved oxygen barrier properties were mainly observed for those obtained under high-shear hydrolysis conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.