ArticlePolymers2026
Effect of Glass and Recycled Concrete Aggregate Content on Slag-Rich Alkali-Activated Concrete Reinforced with Tire-Derived Textile Fibers.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, the effect of substituting waste glass aggregate and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) at different ratios (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%) on the compressive strength performance of geopolymer concretes reinforced with tire-derived textile fibers (TDTF) was investigated. A total of 22 different mixtures were prepared, and their 7-day and 28-day compressive strengths, water absorption rates, and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) were determined. The results showed that TDTF improved compressive strength in both waste aggregate series, with a more pronounced contribution at 28 days. Increasing the waste glass aggregate content reduced 28-day compressive strength by 16-31% compared with the control mixture, whereas RCA mixtures showed only 1-4% strength loss up to 60% replacement and 17-19% loss at higher replacement levels. Glass aggregate mixtures generally exhibited higher early-age strength, while RCA mixtures performed better at 28 days. TDTF addition increased the 28-day compressive strength by approximately 25-30%, depending on aggregate type and replacement level. The lowest water absorption value was obtained in the fiber-reinforced glass aggregate series, whereas the highest value was measured in the RCA series, mainly due to the porous adhered mortar on RCA particles. Based on the compressive strength, water absorption, and UPV results, RCA replacement levels up to 60% and glass aggregate replacement levels of 40-60% may be considered suitable for the mixtures examined in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.