ArticlePolymers2026
Programming Failure Mode Transitions in Polyurea-Reinforced 3D-Printed ABS and PA-GF Cellular Metamaterial Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topology-Driven Compression and Energy Absorption of PLA-Lattice-Reinforced Mortar.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Tensile Response and Energy Absorption of Galvanized Steel Mesh-Reinforced Cement Mortar with Alkali-Resistant Glass Fibers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additively manufactured cellular architectures frequently exhibit brittle failure under impact due to layer-induced stress concentrations. Through the programming of architectural and material design, specifically combining Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) lattice topology with hyperelastic polyurea infiltration, this study achieves active control over the macroscopic transition from catastrophic structural fragmentation to stable progressive collapse. To evaluate this, auxetic and honeycomb specimens printed with ABS and glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide (PA-GF) were evaluated in unreinforced and polyurea-infiltrated states under quasi-static compression, three-point bending, and Charpy impact loading. Results show that the compressive response depends primarily on cellular topology; the pure auxetic (A-A) configuration provided the highest stiffness and energy absorption. Polyurea infiltration did not significantly alter elastic stiffness but increased post-yield stability, leading to a 96.6% elastic recovery in PA-GF A-A structures. In flexure, the base polymer governed stiffness, with ABS structures measuring 68% stiffer than PA-GF. Unreinforced ABS achieved 34% higher specific energy absorption (SEA) than PA-GF under compression, with the A-H topology maximizing SEA. Under dynamic impact, PA-GF absorbed an average of 70% more energy than ABS, and the H-A configuration recorded the highest impact resistance. The addition of polyurea shifted the failure mode from brittle fragmentation to stable elastomeric deformation, increasing absorbed impact energy by 52% for ABS and over 30% for PA-GF, preventing catastrophic structural failure. Integrating topological sequencing with elastomeric confinement provides a direct method to control energy dissipation and damage tolerance in 3D-printed cellular composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.