Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42356990›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Comparative Study of Mechanical Behavior and Failure Mechanisms in PA6- and PBT-Based Thermoplastic Fiber Metal Laminates.

Balcer Katarzyna, Boroński Dariusz, Skibicki Andrzej

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Balcer KatarzynaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6474-2415
Boroński DariuszFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1525-5511
Skibicki AndrzejFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermoplastic fiber metal laminates (TFMLs) are lightweight hybrid materials combining metallic layers with fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites, offering a high strength-to-weight ratio. Existing studies indicate a limited range of polymer matrices used in such structures, most commonly polyamide 6 (PA6). In this work, polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) was selected as a potential alternative matrix because literature data indicate its lower moisture absorption and good dimensional stability compared with PA6. A comparative analysis of TFMLs based on aluminum and carbon fabric-reinforced composites with PA6 and PBT matrices was conducted. Static tensile tests were performed on base materials, composites, and laminates, supported by analytical modeling using the superposition method and fractographic analysis. The results showed that fiber orientation and polymer content significantly affect stiffness, strength, and damage evolution. Fiber orientation remains the governing factor, controlling load transfer and damage initiation. Laminates with 0/90° fibers exhibited the highest strength, while ±45° configurations showed reduced performance due to shear-dominated deformation. The polymer primarily acts as a matrix, ensuring structural integrity, with comparable mechanical properties for both systems. Delamination at the metal-composite interface was identified as the dominant failure mechanism.

Indexed as

mechanical propertiesSEMTFMLthermoplastic compositesthermoplastic fiber metal laminatewoven fabric composite

Identifiers

PMID42356990
PMCPMC13306959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.