Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42356987›Full record

ReviewPolymers2026

A Review of Modeling Electrical Conductivity in Carbon-Filled Polymer Composites.

Alireza Mohseni, Andrew N Hrymak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alireza MohseniDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-0016-8720
Andrew N HrymakDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9639-9786

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2022-03516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrically conductive polymer composites (ECPCs) have attracted growing interest in applications requiring lightweight, processable, and electrically functional materials. Their increasing use has created a strong need for reliable models capable of predicting electrical conductivity from component properties, composite composition, and microstructural features. Although classical percolation theory can describe the sharp increase in conductivity near the percolation threshold, it is often insufficient for predicting conductivity over a wider range of filler concentrations or for distinguishing the underlying conduction mechanisms. This review examines the main modeling approaches used for carbon-filled polymer composites, including percolation-centered, homogenization, network-based, and data-driven models. These approaches are compared in terms of their assumptions, required inputs, strengths, and limitations, with emphasis on how they account for filler morphology, orientation, dispersion, tunneling effects, and conductive-network formation. The review also identifies key challenges and future needs, particularly the development of integrated, orientation-sensitive, and physically informed models for predicting anisotropic electrical conductivity in processed ECPCs.

Indexed as

anisotropic conductivitycarbon-filled polymer compositesconductive-network modelingelectrical conductivityfiller orientationpercolation theory

Identifiers

PMID42356987
PMCPMC13306369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.