ArticlePolymers2026
Systematic Design of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Triclosan Using Design of Experiments and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An optimized method of triclosan MIPs using a Design of Experiments (DOE) strategy was developed. The concentrations of methacrylic acid (MAA, monomer), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA, co-monomer), and acetonitrile (ACN, solvent) were chosen as the critical parameters for the preparation process since they affect imprinting efficacy, morphological structure, and release profile of the material. A Box-Behnken design was utilized for the evaluation of how these factors influence the imprinting factor (IF). The optimized formulation revealed proper IF value indicating efficient molecular recognition. FTIR analysis validated the presence of acrylate-based bonds in the network structure. In addition, SEM images indicated a porous and aggregated structure of MIPs, which facilitated the accessibility of imprinted cavities. Release kinetics revealed two-phase profiles characterized by a moderate initial stage followed by sustained release up to 48 h. The Korsmeyer-Peppas model represented a better correlation (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.