ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
UAV and Deep Learning for Building Façade Defect Detection: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and deep learning (DL) have introduced a new framework for intelligent building façade defect detection, yet existing studies often focus on isolated technical components and lack a systematic evaluation of the entire pipeline. To address this gap, this paper conducts a systematic literature review of 135 peer-reviewed journal articles retrieved from the Web of Science database over the period 2021-2026. This review investigates four key domains: (1) UAV inspection path planning and data acquisition; (2) multi-modal data fusion; (3) DL-driven defect detection algorithms; and (4) 3D reconstruction and digital twin integration. Our analysis reveals the following main findings. Real-time perception-aware planning is central to UAV path planning, yet most studies lack robustness evaluations under real-world deployment conditions. Multi-modal data fusion improves detection across multiple defect types, yet edge deployment requires balancing lightweight design with recognition stability. Defect recognition algorithms increasingly adopt task-driven architectures, but limited edge-device resources demand joint optimization of efficiency and accuracy. In digital twins, systematic research is still lacking on semantically integrating recognition results into BIM for O&M decision-making, leaving the closed loop from defect detection to maintenance unresolved. This review aims to help researchers and practitioners advance UAV-based inspection from an auxiliary tool to a fully autonomous, reliable intelligent agent for refined management of the urban built environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.