ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Clinical Utility of the TRENDS Remote Monitoring Function Integrated into a Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWearable cardioverter-defibrillators (WCDs) are equipped with the TRENDS remote-monitoring system, enabling continuous assessment of arrhythmias, physiological parameters, and patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the clinical utility of TRENDS-integrated WCD management and compared it with a historical control.
methodsWe prospectively analyzed 36 consecutive patients who received a WCD with TRENDS between 2019 and 2024 and compared them with 30 historical controls treated before the implementation of TRENDS.
resultsThe WCD indications were heart failure as primary prevention (64%) and acute coronary syndrome with ventricular arrhythmias (28%). Among 18 patients who met the criteria for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), including 1 patient with WCD shock, 9 ultimately underwent ICD implantation. The mean daily WCD wear-time was 21.3 h and did not differ significantly from that of the historical control. The response rate to health-related questionnaires was 89%. TRENDS detected symptom exacerbation in 31% of patients, weight gain in 19% of patients, and missed medication in 19% of patients. Daily step-count was significantly lower in patients with ICD indications than in those without (5012 ± 2980 steps vs. 7977 ± 3584 steps,
conclusionsTRENDS provided clinically actionable physiologic and patient-reported information that supported individualized cardiovascular management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.