Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42356921›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Observability- and Identifiability-Guided Sensor-Set Design for Digital-Twin-Assisted Consolidated Bioprocessing.

Mark Korang Yeboah, Nana Yaw Asiedu, Ahmad Addo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark Korang YeboahChair of Dynamics and Control, University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstraße, 47057 Duisburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-2131-3147
Nana Yaw AsieduFaculty of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB, University Post Office, Kumasi 00233, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-7424-3668
Ahmad AddoFaculty of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB, University Post Office, Kumasi 00233, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-1096-3607

Funding

German Academic Exchange Service 57693451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) is difficult to monitor because enzyme production, lignocellulose degradation, sugar release, and fermentation occur simultaneously under sparse measurement, feedstock variability, and plant-model mismatch conditions. This study proposes a computational sensor-set design framework for digital-twin-assisted CBP monitoring. A five-state virtual plant, consisting of active biomass, cellulolytic enzyme activity, residual insoluble substrate, soluble sugar, and ethanol, was used to evaluate all 16 ethanol-mandatory measurement packages formed from ethanol, sugar, biomass, enzyme, and residual-substrate proxy channels. Candidate sensor sets were assessed using finite-difference output sensitivities, Fisher-information-based state-observability and parameter-identifiability analyses, eigenvalue and parameter-correlation diagnostics, and paired Monte Carlo unscented Kalman filter soft-sensing reconstruction. Within the tested five-state virtual-plant benchmark and with the specified excitation schedule, noise assumptions, burden indices, and scoring objective, ethanol-only sensing provided the weakest support for state-aware CBP digital-twin reconstruction. At a 6h sampling interval, the state-observability log-pseudodeterminant increased from 4.18 with ethanol-only sensing to 8.56 after adding soluble sugar and to 16.42 with full-proxy monitoring. The ethanol-sugar-biomass-substrate package also gave strong reduced state-observability performance, with log-pseudodeterminants of 15.12, 13.76, and 12.51 at 6, 12, and 24h, respectively. Biomass and enzyme proxies contributed strongly to parameter learning, and the ethanol-sugar-biomass-enzyme package gave the strongest active parameter-identifiability performance, with log-pseudodeterminants of 10.82, 9.06, and 6.67 at 6, 12, and 24h, respectively. In the paired soft-sensing analysis, full-proxy monitoring reduced the mean latent-state RMSE from 1.1899 to 0.3756, followed by ethanol-biomass-enzyme-substrate with 0.3843 and ethanol-sugar-biomass-substrate with 0.4121. The primary aggregate ranking identified ethanol-sugar-biomass-substrate as the best overall package, with a sensor-value score of 0.8432 and a burden index of 7.0, followed by full-proxy monitoring with a score of 0.8173 and a burden index of 10.0. Robustness tests showed that ethanol-sugar-biomass-substrate remained top-ranked under uniform noise scaling, full UKF missingness, delay and bias stress test conditions, most scoring-weight scenarios, and all tested sensor-specific burden workflows. Full-proxy monitoring remained a close competitor under independent sensor-specific noise variation conditions and became top-ranked for some alternative operating trajectories. The proposed framework provides a simulation-based method for prioritizing informative measurement packages before implementing CBP digital twins in laboratory and pilot-plant settings.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesAlgorithmsBiomassEthanolEthanolconsolidated bioprocessingdigital twinfisher information matrixhybrid gray-box modelmeasurement uncertaintyobservability analysisparameter identifiabilitysensor-set designsoft sensingunscented Kalman filter

Identifiers

PMID42356921
PMCPMC13307552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.